Bug#225704: Bug#229306: ftp.debian.org: Remove boot-floppies
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:36:57AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> I seem to remember that boot-floppies was declared obsolete just after
> woody's release, so isn't it way past time to remove the boot-floppies
> source package from sid?
Please make sure that this situation is corrected first:
boot-floppies | 3.0.22 | stable | source
boot-floppies | 3.0.23 | unstable | source
cjwatson@gluck:~$ ls -l ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-*/current
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-alpha/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-arm/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-hppa/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-i386/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-ia64/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-m68k/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-mips/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-mipsel/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-powerpc/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-s390/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
lrwxrwxrwx 1 archvsyn archvsyn 17 Jun 20 2003 ftp/dists/stable/main/disks-sparc/current -> 3.0.23-2002-05-21
Otherwise removing boot-floppies from unstable will mean that we'll be
shipping boot-floppies in woody without corresponding source. Bug
#225704 is also open about this.
Ccing Joey as stable release manager. Can it be done by hand without an
upload to woody-proposed-updates (which I guess would mean a new version
number, which would mean a rebuild on all architectures, which would
mean great pain)?
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: