ons 2003-03-05 klockan 22.35 skrev Denis Barbier: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:40:32PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote: > [...] > > progress start (can still use this one, and it makes sense) > > progress step <inc> (or progress set <val>) > > progress info <info> > > progress stop > [...] > > The max value is missing: > progress set <val> <max> > The 'set' method is IMO more easily manageable, but you guys are using it, > so you know which one is better. Why would you need max in the progress set command if you've got min and max in progress start (okay I didn't write that, but I meant it) > I also asked whether several progress bars could be displayed > simultaneously. IIRC answer was yes, so adding a label may be > desirable: > progress start <label> > progress set <label> <inc> <max> > progress info <label> <info> > progress stop <label> Hrrm, maybe. It could be tricky frontend-ish... In the text frontend for example. /M
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel