Bug#177343: marked as done (grub-installer: Should support all archs supported by grub)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Mar 2003 11:02:33 -0500
with message-id <E18qEsD-0000Ls-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#177343: fixed in grub-installer 0.0.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2003 23:54:57 +0000
>From pere@gigs.hungry.com Sat Jan 18 17:54:56 2003
Return-path: <pere@gigs.hungry.com>
Received: from ngt102.uio.no (minerva.intern) [129.240.242.102]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18a2ng-00067p-00; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:54:56 -0600
Received: from pere by minerva.intern with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18a2ne-0006Rr-00; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 00:54:54 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: grub-installer: Should support all archs supported by grub
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Message-Id: <E18a2ne-0006Rr-00@minerva.intern>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@gigs.hungry.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 00:54:54 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: grub-installer
Version: 0.0.5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The grub-installer control file states that the package only should
build on Architecture i386. The package should work on all archs
supported by grub. Checking the buildd logs, it seems that at least
hurd-i386 is supported as well. It should be added to the arch list.
Perhaps it would be an idea to add 'grub' to the build depend list, to
make it more obvious that this package require grub to be usefull? Or
perhaps just make it architecture independant, as there is nothing in
the package making stopping it from running on any arch as soon as
grub is available. Then arch could be set to 'any'. :)
Here is a patch relative to 0.0.5 to get both these changes:
--- control 9 Jan 2003 09:39:08 -0000 1.11
+++ control 18 Jan 2003 23:53:30 -0000
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ Section: debian-installer
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Uploaders: Moshe Zadka <moshez@debian.org>, Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@debian.org>-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.1.13), po-debconf (>= 0.5.0)
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.1.13), po-debconf (>= 0.5.0), grub
Standards-Version: 3.5.6
Package: grub-installer
-Architecture: i386
+Architecture: i386, hurd-i386
Provides: bootable-system
Depends: cdebconf-udeb, base-installer
XB-Installer-Menu-Item: 75
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux minerva 2.4.19-386 #1 Sun Oct 6 17:23:00 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=no_NO, LC_CTYPE=no_NO
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 177343-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2003 16:08:17 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Tue Mar 04 10:08:16 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18qExk-00056O-00; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 10:08:16 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18qEsD-0000Ls-00; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 11:02:33 -0500
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org>
To: 177343-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.32 $
Subject: Bug#177343: fixed in grub-installer 0.0.7
Message-Id: <E18qEsD-0000Ls-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 11:02:33 -0500
Delivered-To: 177343-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
grub-installer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
grub-installer_0.0.7.dsc
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.7.dsc
grub-installer_0.0.7.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.7.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.0.7_i386.udeb
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.7_i386.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 177343@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org> (supplier of updated grub-installer package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:38:35 +0100
Source: grub-installer
Binary: grub-installer
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org>
Description:
grub-installer - Install GRUB on a hard disk (udeb)
Closes: 177343
Changes:
grub-installer (0.0.7) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Petter Reinholdtsen
- Added Norwegian Bokmål (nb.po) translations recieved from
Bjørn Steensrud.
- Add hurd-i386 to architecture list, as grub also compiled OK
on hurd-i386 (Closes: #177343).
- Add myself to uploaders.
Files:
5b2b6d0eca7053013fbdc6faacdd5272 695 debian-installer optional grub-installer_0.0.7.dsc
e304b35db8d91b857dbd13d5109a3731 16098 debian-installer optional grub-installer_0.0.7.tar.gz
1b6e1cdbcedf12a1a9596fe84b32f65f 3044 debian-installer optional grub-installer_0.0.7_i386.udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+ZMkn20zMSyow1ykRAspdAJ4qvUTbLJFoWMHWrWWauTsh8F6OigCgiG2W
JSGXB2LywmHdFk4eF+c6xPQ=
=DMr8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: