[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#221716: marked as done (pcmcia-udeb not loaded during CD install; pcmcia does work after install either)



Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500
with message-id <20031231015641.GA28438@kitenet.net>
and subject line d-i pcmcia issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2003 18:26:05 +0000
>From bafishe@sandia.gov Wed Nov 19 12:25:56 2003
Return-path: <bafishe@sandia.gov>
Received: from mm02snlnto.sandia.gov (mm02snlnto.son.sandia.gov) [132.175.109.21] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AMX1Y-0008F9-00; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:25:56 -0600
Received: from 132.175.109.1 by MM01SNLNTO.son.sandia.gov with ESMTP (
 Tumbleweed MMS SMTP Relay 01 (MMS v5.5.3)); Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:25:49
 -0600
Received: from sandia.gov (tetra.sandia.gov [134.253.242.119]) by
 sass165.sandia.gov (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAJIPn3L003659 for
 <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:25:49 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <3FBBB59A.2050104@sandia.gov>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:25:30 -0700
From: "Brice A. Fisher" <bafishe@sandia.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2)
 Gecko/20030708
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Installer problems with PCMCIA on Dell Latitude Laptop
X-PMX-Version: 4.1.0.80455
X-WSS-ID: 13A56A27434621-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=us-ascii;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: Installer (sarge-i386-netinst.iso)
Version: Downloaded 11/5, 17:34 MST

Note, there are actually two bugs here, but it helps to understand the 
second if you read the first.  One bug occurs during installation, the 
other after installation is complete.

1) The installer was unable to successfully start PCMCIA.  I was able to 
start this by hand, but it was a bit of a roundabout procedure. 
Selecting the menu entry to start PCMCIA did nothing, but if I selected 
to load a network driver ("Detect network hardware..."), picked a 
network driver, and let it fail to load, then I could go to a virtual 
terminal (Ctrl-Alt-F2) and do an "/etc/init.d/pcmcia start" and 
everything would work fine (alternatively, going back to "Start PC Card 
Services" works after failing to load a network driver, then you can go 
back and "Detect network hardware").  I could then load my network 
driver and go.  Note that, if I went straight to the virtual terminal 
and tried to start pcmcia it would fail (with "modprobe: Can't locate 
module pcmcia_core"), I had to go through the menu and fail loading the 
network card first (I assume something is loaded in the background in 
that step that then lets PCMCIA initialization work).

2) After installation, when the system rebooted, PCMCIA support had not 
been installed.  I had to manually copy the PCMCIA modules from the 
installation disk and edit the configuration to start PCMCIA.  Also, 
after the apt-get steps run by the first login, which include 
re-installing the same kernel that was installed during installation (I 
assume this is because I downloaded a recent NetInst image), the new 
installation failed to include the pcmcia-modules package and I had to 
add this in by hand.



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 222775-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 04:30:32 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Tue Dec 30 22:30:31 2003
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AbVz0-0003f8-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:21:14 -0600
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs19-176.access.naxs.com [216.98.94.176])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B7217E54
	for <222775-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:21:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DCEBC6E0EB; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
To: 222775-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: d-i pcmcia issues
Message-ID: <20031231015641.GA28438@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 222775-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level: 


--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The d-i pcmcia issues are fixed; grab a current netinst cd and give it
another go.

--=20
see shy jo

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/8izZd8HHehbQuO8RAnp5AJ0VMlkRPAQMQ1U/hUBm+CN3T/UwBACeNogf
DJ3sHz91xvHr0kFF5wgqCRU=
=L9zL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--



Reply to: