Re: debian-installer/rootskel/debian changelog,1.168,1.169

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: debian-installer/rootskel/debian changelog,1.168,1.169
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:35:22 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20031231013522.GA25115@kitenet.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <E1AbTJR-000828-00@quantz.debian.org>
References: <E1AbTJR-000828-00@quantz.debian.org>

So why does rootskel need /var/run? Just curious..

> +  * Matt Kraai
> +    - Create /var/run.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: debian-installer/rootskel/debian changelog,1.168,1.169
  - From: Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>

Prev by Date: Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
Next by Date: Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
Previous by thread: Bug#212143: netcfg mailname
Next by thread: Re: debian-installer/rootskel/debian changelog,1.168,1.169
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread