Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Joey Hess wrote (with lots snipped out by me): > > i386: On track for beta 2 > > powerpc: Very shakey > > ia64: Likely to be in beta 2 > > mips: May be in beta 2 > > arm: Uncertian > The buildds are still down for ARM. And apparently it doesn't have > d-i kernels yet. Ow. Is this even likely to be released with sarge at > this rate? I have seen some recent activity from Vincent Sanders, so I still have some hope for beta 3. > > mipsel: ? > > What is the status of these others, then? I'm going to make wild, > uneducated guesses. :-) What, like my guesses were not wild and uneducated? :-) > m68k: ??? > No signs of activity since October? amiga and mac appear to be the > only variants which even have kernels built? Is this even likely to get > released with sarge at this rate? Obviosuly not. A port can only miss so many betas, before it ends up missing the release.. > sparc: ??? > One buildd apparently up, and only one. But people are definitely > working on d-i for sparc, and the kernels look OK. I assume that buildds will be coming back on line when James Troup and others get back from holidays. > alpha: ??? > Used to be one of the better supported arches, but it doesn't look > like anyone's worked on it since October? Unfortunatly the CD images are broken. > hppa: Close to working. > Apparently Thorsten Sauter has this working, and it's "just" a matter > of getting the build process automated properly? Seems so. > s390: ??? > Buildds are still down for s390. At least the infamous busybox bug > #216528 has recently been fixed. Ports of software to s390 seem to have > a curious habit of going from totally broken to totally working very > quickly (maybe because the machines are so fast that the testing cycle > is extra-fast?), so I'm not about to worry, though. Ditto. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature