On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:26:21PM +0000, Richard Hirst wrote: > Havn't looked closely at this code, but that struct looks like it will > end up generating lots of unaligned access traps on ia64, as mem[] will > be on a 4 rather than 8 byte binary. please explain why the size of size_t is 4 bytes on your ia64, any ia64 machine i know have 8 byte. > I'm a little confused, because I > thought this allocation stuff had been ripped out in favour of plain > malloc(). Not yet, as someone break make demo and therefor the debugging facility. Bastian -- Insufficient facts always invite danger. -- Spock, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature