Bug#216976: marked as done (The 2003-10-21 i386 bootfloppy-image.img -> Kernel panic.)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:06:51 GMT
with message-id <200310231606.h9NG6oak029655@zoot.lafn.org>
and subject line Bug#216919: remove localudebs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2003 22:19:10 +0000
>From shaulk@actcom.net.il Tue Oct 21 17:19:09 2003
Return-path: <shaulk@actcom.net.il>
Received: from mail.actcom.co.il (smtp2.actcom.co.il) [192.114.47.15]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AC4qL-0002vy-00; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:19:09 -0500
Received: from rakefet (line105-152.adsl.actcom.co.il [192.117.105.152])
by smtp2.actcom.co.il (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9LMJ6hD030929
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:19:07 +0200
Received: from shaul by rakefet with local (Exim 4.22)
id 1AC4qI-0002xF-2C
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:19:06 +0200
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:19:05 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: The 2003-10-21 i386 bootfloppy-image.img -> Kernel panic.
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20031021221905.GV16907@rakefet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Shaul Karl <shaulk@actcom.net.il>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: install
Severity: grave
The 2003-10-21 i386 bootfloppy-image.img creates a kernel panic.
Last messages are BusyBox usage message which includes the `Currently
defined functions' and then there is a Kernel panic message because of
an attempt to kill init.
--
Shaul Karl, shaulk @ actcom . net . il
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 216919-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 16:06:54 +0000
>From kraai@lafn.org Thu Oct 23 11:06:53 2003
Return-path: <kraai@lafn.org>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AChzA-0006sU-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:06:53 -0500
Received: from 64-162-186-125.ded.pacbell.net (zoom [206.117.18.8])
by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with SMTP id h9NG6oak029655;
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from kraai@lafn.org)
Message-Id: <200310231606.h9NG6oak029655@zoot.lafn.org>
To: Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6gren?= <md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se>,
216919-done@bugs.debian.org
From: kraai@lafn.org
Subject: Re: Bug#216919: remove localudebs
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:06:51 GMT
X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Standard Edition v3.0.26
Delivered-To: 216919-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_60,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Martin Sjogren wrote:
> tor 2003-10-23 klockan 00.30 skrev kraai@debian.org:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > The bootfloppy fails to boot because it uses an obsolete version of
> > rootskel-bootfloppy that is present in localudebs. Please remove it
(and> , since
> > joeyh has fixed it, busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb).
>
> Hm, I thought I'd done that, but apparently not. Ah well, it's fixed
> now, today's build should be good.
Yep, it works, thanks.
--
Matt
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent using the LA Free-Net - LA's best kept secret.
http://www.lafn.org/
Reply to: