[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#216528: busybox-cvs doesn't build on s390



On Sun Oct 19, 2003 at 03:50:53PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: busybox-cvs
> Version: 20030926-2
> Severity: serious
> 
> buildd.debian.org lists the following build failure on s390:
> 
> <--  snip  -->
> 
> ...
> gcc -I./include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=6
> 4 -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -DN
> DEBUG    -I./modutils/obj -DELF_MACHINE_H='"elf_s390.h"' -DARCH_s390  -c -o mod
> utils/obj/obj_s390.o modutils/obj/obj_s390.c
> modutils/obj/obj_s390.c: In function `obj_arch_apply_relocation':
> modutils/obj/obj_s390.c:204: error: `R_390_GOTOFF' undeclared (first use in thi
> s function)
> modutils/obj/obj_s390.c:204: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported onl
> y once
> modutils/obj/obj_s390.c:204: error: for each function it appears in.)
> modutils/obj/obj_s390.c: In function `obj_arch_create_got':
> modutils/obj/obj_s390.c:264: error: `R_390_GOTOFF' undeclared (first use in thi
> s function)

According to this:
    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-01/msg00290.html
The symbol R_390_GOTOFF was changed to R_390_GOTOFF32.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--



Reply to: