[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#182464: marked as done (anna: Extra package selection should not be at default priority level)

Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:41:23 +0200
with message-id <20031003134123.10524.qmail@mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
and subject line Fixed with cdebconf upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2003 17:59:38 +0000
>From mbc@debian.org Tue Feb 25 11:59:37 2003
Return-path: <mbc@debian.org>
Received: from relay.pair.com [] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18njMf-000759-00; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:59:37 -0600
Received: (qmail 36948 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2003 17:59:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bakunin.sd.lindows.com) (
  by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2003 17:59:36 -0000
Received: from mbc by bakunin.sd.lindows.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 18njL5-0003h9-00; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:57:59 -0800
From: Michael Cardenas <mbc@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: anna: Extra package selection should not be at default priority level
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:57:59 -0800
Message-Id: <E18njL5-0003h9-00@bakunin.sd.lindows.com>
Sender: <mbc@rilke>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0

Package: anna
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-25
Severity: normal

When doing an install with d-i and selecting the default priority level, the 
selection of extra packages such as scsi modules shouldn't be asked. 

The default settings do and should work on most hardware, and if you have 
special hardware like a scsi card, then you can select a different priority   

Having just done an install with d-i on my dell c610 laptop, I noticed that
this question was probably the only one that was extraneous. 



-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bakunin 2.4.20 #1 Sun Feb 16 14:27:31 PST 2003 i686

Received: (at 182464-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2003 11:44:03 +0000
>From sebastian.ley@mmweg.rwth-aachen.de Fri Oct 03 06:44:01 2003
Return-path: <sebastian.ley@mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
Received: from ms-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A5OLp-0005k2-00; Fri, 03 Oct 2003 06:44:01 -0500
Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [])
 by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003))
 with ESMTP id <0HM600C23J4ZYR@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for
 182464-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:41:24 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from relay.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([])
	by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri,
 03 Oct 2003 13:41:23 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de
 (mx.mmweg.RWTH-Aachen.DE [])	by relay.rwth-aachen.de
 (8.12.10/8.12.7-1) with SMTP id h93BfNsU021885	for
 <182464-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:41:23 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 10527 invoked by alias); Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:41:23 +0000
Received: (qmail 10519 invoked from network); Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:41:23 +0000
Received: from coyote.mmweg ( by hub.mmweg with SMTP; Fri,
 03 Oct 2003 11:41:23 +0000
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 13:41:23 +0200
From: Sebastian Ley <sebastian.ley@mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Fixed with cdebconf upload
To: 182464-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-id: <20031003134123.10524.qmail@mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: 182464-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=4.0
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1 (

As we have bumbped the standard priority of d-i to high, the selection
of extra packages will now not be presented to the user by default. This
should close your bug.

Reply to: