Re: Bug#212101: kernel CONFIG_TR interferes with busybox CONFIG_TR
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:38:26PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Discussing with Jeff Bailey on IRC today indicates that a solution is
> forthcoming on this bug: he estimates that in a week, there will be new
> glibc packages in the archive that don't depend on the upstream kernel
> headers for what they expose to userspace. Is this an acceptable
> timeline to d-i folks for having headers that can be used for building
> busybox on ia64 and alpha (estimate 3 weeks to testing), or does anyone
> want to consider kludging the busybox sources to work around this
> namespace pollution problem?
If I didn't say that they were going in experimental, sorry for not
being clearer. Certainly the glibc team agreed that the right thing was
to do this.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
Reply to: