Sebastian Ley wrote: >>>I like sebastians proposal of having frontends in librarys for every >>configuration udeb. > > The more I think of it, the more I start to dislike it ;-) Imagine how > much work it really is to do such a thing. There must be > #udebs x #frontends of custom widgets. If a change in the module > involves a change in the UI, all frontend widgets must be changed. I > don't know if that is feasable... If this is the problem, maybe keeping non-graphical installs as is and having a parallel system for the graphical installer is an option. That would still mean a lot of duplicated effort, but I guess if the alternatives boil down to an overdesigned "this handles every case" it's still worth a thought. (Maybe only a short one, though...) Cheers T.
Attachment:
pgppOmPAzU44Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature