Re: cdeboostrap
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:05:58AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Nice, it might cut down the shell commands that are needed.
not realy, it don't need much commands which aren't needed elsewhere,
but it needs a full posix shell.
> It might be convenient to merge it into busybox.
i don't think this is currently possible because of the internal
structure.
bastian
ps: your mua is buggy, it don't respect the Mail-Follow-Up header.
--
Sometimes a feeling is all we humans have to go on.
-- Kirk, "A Taste of Armageddon", stardate 3193.9
Reply to: