mån 2003-03-24 klockan 18.14 skrev Matt Kraai: > > The parsing was the least concern. Bad explanations on my part, I'm > > worried about false negatives and false positives. Most udebs end in > > "-udeb" so that's far from conclusive. And I can imagine udebs with > > "-modules-" in the name, even if we have none now. I guess we should > > cross-run the info in the name with the version of the udeb to be on the > > safe side. > > > > I have, however implemented the first step (parsing the package name) > > and the CVS version seems to work fine. > > Why not check if the module package depends on the kernel-image > package corresponding to the kernel in use? That's another check that can be made, though I'm not sure if it's enough to be conclusive. /M -- Martin Sjögren sjogren@debian.org -- marvin@dum.chalmers.se GPG key: http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/gpg.html let hello = "hello" : hello in putStr (unlines hello)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel