Re: udeb priority issues
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:15:58AM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
> lör 2003-03-01 klockan 09.08 skrev Emile van Bergen:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
> >
> > > fre 2003-02-28 klockan 21.22 skrev Emile van Bergen:
> > > > I mean, "tasksel"?! No offense, but I highly doubt that a sane installer
> > > > really needs something like tasksel to select which installer modules
> > > > should be downloaded at run time before doing the actual installation.
> > >
> > > I'd much prefer tasksel to dselect :) if we want to use analogies.
> > > Currently anna asks about individual modules, since there are just so
> > > ***ing many of them I want to simplify this, and tasks is one of my
> > > ideas, I welcome others. :)
> >
> > Hm, staying with analogies, perhaps having an /etc/modules file in
> > addition to modconf would be an idea?
>
> Whoops, terminology problem. I'm talking about "installer modules", i.e.
> udebs, not kernel modules.
Me too, sorry for the confusion, /etc/modules is just an analogy
("staying with analogies, ...").
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | emile@e-advies.info
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info
Reply to: