[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#177346: main-menu: useless question when only one option is available



severity 177346 wishlist
severity 177445 wishlist
thanks

sön 2003-01-19 klockan 01.06 skrev Petter Reinholdtsen:
> When installing, and only one package satisfy a required virtual
> package, a question with only one alternative is presented.  In the
> cases where only one package is listed, the question should not be
> presented at all, and the only available option should chosen
> automatically.
> 
> Example from a CDROM install:
> 
>   Choose the retriever to use.
>   The retriever is responsible for fetching the modules to be installed.
>     1. cdrom-retriever: CDROM retriever (default)
>   Prompt: 1 - 1>

I can agree with this one (which is actually in anna, as Matt noted
too), but it might also be nice to actually see where the modules are
coming from.
is.

> Another example from the same install:
> 
>   Choose a configuration step
> 
>   This configuration step requires one or more configuration steps that have not
>   yet been performed.  Please select a configuration step to continue.
>     1. Automatically Partition Hard Drives (unsafe) (default)
>   Prompt: 1 - 1>
> 
> Both questions are useless.

Yes and no. I've been thinking on adding an "Abort" choice (which will
be implemented as a debconf back thingy, rather) so that you can go back
to the main menu if you don't want to do the middle step, and perhaps an
"Override" choice instead of the dummy packages we have now.

For both cases, there is also the UI design principle of not changing an
interface between invocations, which is why you rather gray out and
disable options (in a GUI) than hide them, when they are unavailable.
"Things moving around" is more applicable to a GUI of course, but I
don't know which is more confusing, being asked a question with just one
answer, or suddenly being asked extra questions when you try to do the
same thing again. Do we have any usability people on this list? I don't
really know anything about this.

/Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel


Reply to: