Re: Default disk partition table type?

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Default disk partition table type?
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: 12 Dec 2002 16:02:44 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 2fl7kefuvor.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87u1hkcdk3.fsf@rover.gag.com>
References: <[🔎] E18LilP-0006fM-00@saruman.uio.no> <[🔎] 20021211003302.GP24337@sleepie.demon.co.uk> <[🔎] 2fllm2wv7ml.fsf@saruman.uio.no> <[🔎] 87u1hkcdk3.fsf@rover.gag.com>

[Bdale Garbee]
> No.  Any new ia64 installation should use GPT, not FAT-style MSDOS labels.

Do you know what parted calls these disk labels?  I do not.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Default disk partition table type?
  - From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>

References:
- Default disk partition table type?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: Default disk partition table type?
  - From: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
- Re: Default disk partition table type?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: Default disk partition table type?
  - From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>

Prev by Date: Re: working on the Alpha port
Next by Date: mklibs doesn't manage to include symbol atexit
Previous by thread: Re: Default disk partition table type?
Next by thread: Re: Default disk partition table type?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread