Re: New boot-floppies for 3.0r1?
Eduard Bloch <email@example.com> writes:
> Moin Adam!
> Adam Di Carlo schrieb am Mittwoch, den 11. September 2002:
> > > I'm in favor of doing a new boot-floppies release, hopefully we can
> > > get it tested for 3.0.r1, seconds?
> I am not sure how to test it extensively without moving it to testing. But
> OTOH testing currently has packages which are not installable with Woody's
> debootstrap so it would require a separated build.
Well, what we're *supposed* to do is build different 126.96.36.199.woody
for stable-proposed-updates and 188.8.131.52.sarge for unstable ->
testing, e.g., two different binary builds but I don't know if that's
practical for all arches. It's troubling.
> > I second. I beg you to remember that we are actually looking to get
> > both 3.0.23 and 3.0.24 into woody. Stable has 3.0.22.
> Yes and no. Stable has 3.0.23 binary build, but the source of 3.0.22 since
> 3.0.23 was excluded because of RC bugs.
Oh, wow, I didn't realize that.
...Adam Di Carlo..<firstname.lastname@example.org>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>