[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#105648: marked as done (sbc60xxwdt installed when selecting sb)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Sep 2002 23:21:43 -0700
with message-id <20020912062143.GA12347@kimdon.org>
and subject line these modconf bugs are fixed and done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2001 15:11:00 +0000
>From Nicolas.Sabouret@limsi.fr Tue Jul 17 10:11:00 2001
Return-path: <Nicolas.Sabouret@limsi.fr>
Received: from m7.limsi.fr [::ffff:] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15MWUt-0005TJ-00; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:10:59 -0500
Received: from limsi.fr (mpc140.limsi.u-psud.fr [])
          by m7.limsi.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id RAA03067
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:11:37 +0200 (MET DST)
Sender: Nicolas.Sabouret@limsi.fr
Message-ID: <3B54564D.9554CDCB@limsi.fr>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:14:21 +0200
From: Nicolas SABOURET <Nicolas.Sabouret@limsi.fr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: sbc60xxwdt installed when selecting sb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: modconf

I'm surprised this bug hasn't been reported before, but I didn't find it
in the archive. Maybe it is not a bug and there is sth I didn't
understand. If this is the case, please excuse me for the trouble.

using modconf in potato, when I select the module "sb", it proposes me
to install sbc60xxwdt (instead of "sb").

LIMSI-CNRS, BP133, 91403 Orsay, France

Received: (at 105648-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2002 06:17:07 +0000
>From dwhedon@kimdon.org Thu Sep 12 01:17:07 2002
Return-path: <dwhedon@kimdon.org>
Received: from 12-233-47-38.client.attbi.com (oink) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17pNHn-0008Cb-00; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 01:17:07 -0500
Received: by oink (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 7FB50739E1; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 23:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 23:21:43 -0700
From: David Kimdon <dwhedon@debian.org>
To: 117283-done@bugs.debian.org, 136000-done@bugs.debian.org,
	58007-done@bugs.debian.org, 94536-done@bugs.debian.org,
	105648-done@bugs.debian.org, 117474-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: these modconf bugs are fixed and done
Message-ID: <20020912062143.GA12347@kimdon.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: 105648-done@bugs.debian.org

These bugs are fixed, they have been for some time but have been
marked fixed in NMU until now.


Reply to: