Re: A suggestion for the woody freeze
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Getting pcmcia-cs into woody would be very good.
> pcmcia-cs has not seen any new version since potato to enter
But where is the problem??
~> madison pcmcia-cs
pcmcia-cs | 3.1.20-2 | stable | alpha
pcmcia-cs | 3.1.20-2 | testing | alpha
pcmcia-cs | 3.1.22-0.1potato | testing | source, i386, powerpc
pcmcia-cs | 3.1.22-0.2potato | stable | source, i386, powerpc
pcmcia-cs | 3.1.22-3 | unstable | alpha
pcmcia-cs | 3.1.28-2 | unstable | powerpc
pcmcia-cs | 3.1.29-3 | unstable | arm
pcmcia-cs | 3.1.31-3 | unstable | source, i386
I can't see any RC bug of pcmcia-cs in the BTS.
By the way it is not in my hands to fix this because I do not have
any such stuff to test, but perhaps we could enforce something by
discussing it here (or is this a FAQ??).
> The kernel and the modules seem to be always out of date on woody.
Why not just freeze the kernel-modules?
RC-Bug of the week: 118793