[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#117914: marked as done (boot-floppies: debootstrap fails - install impossible)



Your message dated 10 Nov 2001 13:47:00 -0500
with message-id <oabsia8nvf.fsf@arroz.onshored.com>
and subject line Bug#117914: boot-floppies: debootstrap fails - install impossible
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2001 19:05:46 +0000
>From ahuxley@eso.org Thu Nov 01 13:05:46 2001
Return-path: <ahuxley@eso.org>
Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15zN9t-0006No-00; Thu, 01 Nov 2001 13:05:46 -0600
Received: (qmail 26124 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 15:04:59 -0000
Received: from eso-wall2-ext.hq.eso.org (firewall-user@134.171.69.198)
  by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 15:04:59 -0000
Received: by eso-wall2-ext.hq.eso.org; id QAA12070; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:04:57 +0100 (MET)
Received: from web3.hq.eso.org(134.171.7.4) by eso-wall2-ext.hq.eso.org via smap (V5.5)
	id xma012066; Thu, 1 Nov 01 16:03:59 +0100
Received: from mailrelay.hq.eso.org (mailrelay.hq.eso.org [134.171.15.25])
	by web3.hq.eso.org (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA26402
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:03:59 +0100 (MET)
Received: from te35.hq.eso.org (ahuxley@te35.hq.eso.org [134.171.12.10])
	by mailrelay.hq.eso.org (8.8.5/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04822
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:03:58 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ahuxley@localhost) by te35.hq.eso.org (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.7.3) id QAA06459 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:03:57 +0100 (MET)
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:03:57 +0100
From: Alexis Huxley <ahuxley@eso.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: boot-floppies: debootstrap fails - install impossible
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20011101160357.A6355@te35.hq.eso.org>
Reply-To: Alexis Huxley <ahuxley@eso.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: boot-floppies: debootstrap fails
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 3.0.15-2001-10-18
Severity: critical


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: <deleted by user>


I am sending this bug from another machine because the machine on
which the problem occurs has not successfully been installed because
of the problem I am about to report here, hence deleteing the kernel
version information above.

The version of boot-floppies above is the directory name under
debian/dists/woody/main/disks-i386 from which I took images-1.44's
rescue and root, and the drivers.tgz.

Anyway, on with the bug report. I boot the rescue and switch the root
fine. I've mounted a couple of partitions in order to see the Debian
archive on my own machine (put there with older Debian installation
in different partition). I specify that I want to configure kernel
modules and add pcnet32, st, sg. Then when I proceed to installing
the base system, I get the little progress bar appearing, the message
displayed is 'calling debootstrap', and when the bar just begins
to move off, I get an window with title "Error" and with message
"Couldn't download at". Yup, that's all. When I press enter to
continue, I am returned to the main installation menu with the same
'Next' and alternates displayed.

This error was *very* reproducible; I got it each of the about ten
times I tried.

I don't know that I can really offer you much more information, since
I'm now going back to 2.2R3's CDROMs to install a base system, and
then I'll just do an upgrade to get to my intended 'testing' system,
but if you let me know ... Thanks.

Alexis Huxley ahuxley@eso.org

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 117914-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2001 18:46:45 +0000
>From adam@onshore-devel.com Sat Nov 10 12:46:45 2001
Return-path: <adam@onshore-devel.com>
Received: from arroz.onshored.com [216.220.101.2] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 162d9R-0002gd-00; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 12:46:45 -0600
Received: from arroz.onshored.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arroz.onshored.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B267094092; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:47:00 -0500 (EST)
Sender: adam@arroz.onshored.com
To: Alexis Huxley <ahuxley@eso.org>
Cc: 117914-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#117914: boot-floppies: debootstrap fails - install impossible
References: <[🔎] 20011101160357.A6355@te35.hq.eso.org>
Organization: onShore Development, Inc
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore-devel.com>
Date: 10 Nov 2001 13:47:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20011101160357.A6355@te35.hq.eso.org>
Message-ID: <oabsia8nvf.fsf@arroz.onshored.com>
Lines: 20
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 117914-done@bugs.debian.org


> Then when I proceed to installing
> the base system, I get the little progress bar appearing, the message
> displayed is 'calling debootstrap', and when the bar just begins
> to move off, I get an window with title "Error" and with message
> "Couldn't download at". Yup, that's all. When I press enter to
> continue, I am returned to the main installation menu with the same
> 'Next' and alternates displayed.
> 
> This error was *very* reproducible; I got it each of the about ten
> times I tried.

The newer debootstrap 3.0.16, already released, contained a fixed
debootstrap which corrected this.

Unfortunately, no one ever built it for i386.  I'll try to make sure
there is a 3.0.16 or 3.0.17 for i386 this weekend.

-- 
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>



Reply to: