Bug#85344: marked as done (http port setting ignored)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:46:29 -0700
with message-id <20010412174629.A175@brandx.net>
and subject line not-a-bug (TM)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2001 07:00:54 +0000
>From willey@protectix.com Fri Feb 09 01:00:54 2001
Return-path: <willey@protectix.com>
Received: from adsl-63-199-136-124.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (smtp.protectix.com) [::ffff:63.199.136.124]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14R7Xx-0006VD-00; Fri, 09 Feb 2001 01:00:45 -0600
Received: (qmail 7218 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2001 07:00:43 -0000
Received: from adsl-63-199-136-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO protectix.com) (63.199.136.122)
by adsl-63-199-136-124.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with SMTP; 9 Feb 2001 07:00:43 -0000
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: installer ignores port when installing over network
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 23:00:43 -0800
From: Mark Willey <willey@protectix.com>
Message-Id: <E14R7Xx-0006VD-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: installation
Version: ? debian 2.2r2 idepci images
I set up a debian mirror locally and was having a hard time installing from
it as I had the httpd bound to port 8080, and the port 8080 specified in
the installer. It turns out that the installer uses port 80 even when told
to use port 1234.
Mark
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 85344-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2001 00:49:00 +0000
>From kraai@brandx.net Thu Apr 12 19:49:00 2001
Return-path: <kraai@brandx.net>
Received: from smtp2.abac.com [216.55.128.11]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14nrlk-0002Ka-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:49:00 -0500
Received: from catalonia (c16-129.015.popsite.net [64.24.196.129])
by smtp2.abac.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f3D0n2v29246
for <85344-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kraai by catalonia with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14nrjJ-00004h-00
for <85344-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:46:29 -0700
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:46:29 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@debian.org>
To: 85344-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: not-a-bug (TM)
Message-ID: <20010412174629.A175@brandx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Matt Kraai <kraai@brandx.net>
Delivered-To: 85344-done@bugs.debian.org
Howdy,
It turns out that this problem was due to an unclear dialog box.
A field is labeled "Port", and the submitter assumed that this
was the webserver port, rather than the proxy port. I've updated
the label to be "Proxy Port".
Matt
Reply to: