Re: Graphical installation
<sameless plug> Here at work we use Microwindows for alot of stuff and
that is a very light windowing system. You can write apps in raw nano-x
(mircowin API) or in FLTK using the flnx library. One of the guys I work
with has microwindows working on his tuxscreen (www.tuxscreen.net) using
only his 4MB flash for loader,kernel, and root filesystem (includes html
3.0 browser). On the technical side the nano-X server fits in about 250K,
libnano-X.so is 45K and apps come in at about 25k for small programs/games
and the bigger ones can get up to 90K + libs. It's worth a look.
</shameless plug>
BTW: Microwindows can be found at microwindows.org
Shaun
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Yves BAILLY wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry to bother you.
>
> I've just read your interview on this page :
> http://www.debianplanet.org/debianplanet/article.php?sid=526
>
> If you're interested, I think I would be pleases to volonteer in helping
> to develop a graphical installation for Debian. I know well the Qt library,
> which can work in a pure frame buffer way (with Qt/Embedded), thus avoiding
> the need for X.
>
> Feel free to contact me in case you think I can be of any help.
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> (�< | Yves Bailly : http://kafka-fr.net | -�)
> //\ | Linux Dijon : http://www.coagul.org | //\
> \_/ | Don d'organe : http://adot21.free.fr | \_/`
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: