[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#61802: marked as done ([alpha] bugs in documentation)



Your message dated 25 Nov 2001 20:24:00 +0100
with message-id <873d32d57z.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
and subject line [alpha] bugs in documentation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2000 23:36:03 +0000
Received: (qmail 15799 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2000 23:36:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO davinci.tron.priv.at) (postfix@195.202.175.174)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2000 23:36:02 -0000
Received: by davinci.tron.priv.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4C246A7A1; Wed,  5 Apr 2000 01:36:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 01:36:48 +0200
From: Othmar Pasteka <pasteka@kabsi.at>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: documentation bugs in alpha install docs
Message-ID: <20000405013648.A6642@tron.priv.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Sender: othmar@tron.priv.at

Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.10
Severity: normal

Hi,

i read through the installation manual and found some glitches or things
which should be improved. i already mailed it to the b-f mailinglist, adam
told me to file a bug, so here it is:
the boot floppies i used were 2.2.10 and used the documentation which was
accompanied with these b-fs.

<quote>

what i missed in the install docs for installing debian on an
alpha is the description of BSD disklabels. what is it for,
what's the theory and such things that one can imagine what
he/she has to configure. i couldn't have partitioned the harddisk
without knowing bsd disklabels from *BSD ... also a little
example would be nice in the docs how this should look like at
the end.
furthermore i am/was quite confused about the aboot stuff what
the story behind this was. should i leave some megs for it or
not? should they be within an partiton or should the first
partition start right after the non-partitioned space for aboot
... some one else answered me the question but well i couln't
have figured this out on my own.
and there is also a bug in the pdf versions of th einstall guide.
in point 5.2 is a listing of the   various subarchs and the i
mages which should be in there, so, alpha has many subarchs and
the list is pretty long but the long list doesn't get break up at
the end of the text, i.e. is just one long line.
another thing which puzzled me was that under the subarch dir
resc14440.bin etc. should be (if i read the docs) but actually,
the most i can find is just milo.bin, so what's the magic behind
this?

</quote>

Note: forget the system information below.

so long
Othmar

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux davinci 2.2.14 #4 Tue Apr 4 00:40:42 CEST 2000 i586
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 61802-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2001 19:24:18 +0000
>From falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de Sun Nov 25 13:24:18 2001
Return-path: <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.de) [194.25.134.80] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 1684t0-0000Vy-00; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 13:24:18 -0600
Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout01.sul.t-online.de with smtp 
	id 1684sz-0002ME-01; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:24:17 +0100
Received: from localhost (520013318687-0001@[217.230.22.237]) by fmrl06.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 1684sk-0TR3b6C; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:24:02 +0100
Received: from falk by localhost with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 1684sj-0004D1-00
	for <61802-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:24:01 +0100
X-Face: >Q)4Pn.JVfRz{G(G_eIkykbZGG\)2mk8:5a"{^Mk07iC#F.t2L7h<Sa|7Zr1_L8[nbiq:8F
 %o\(7>|]{*cFg$GEPDdun~+UTjG(^4z<_Ksw%L-\w0xDmUR~<zsnGH]&sK=M\Y=;U4XZ"z)[CX6I6d
 _p
To: 61802-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [alpha] bugs in documentation
From: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: 25 Nov 2001 20:24:00 +0100
Message-ID: <873d32d57z.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Lines: 8
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.5 (anise)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Falk Hueffner <falk@borkum>
X-Sender: 520013318687-0001@t-dialin.net
Delivered-To: 61802-done@bugs.debian.org

I think this has been made sufficiently clear in the woody
installation manual:

ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-alpha/current/doc/ch-partitioning.en.html

If not, please complain :)

        Falk



Reply to: