Bug#70991: marked as done (Update request for documentation)
Your message dated 17 Oct 2001 23:31:20 -0400
with message-id <oavghd62uv.fsf@arroz.onshored.com>
and subject line b-f bug cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2000 08:55:09 +0000
>From roland@darkwing.cysonet.com Wed Sep 06 03:55:09 2000
Return-path: <roland@darkwing.cysonet.com>
Received: from darkwing.cysonet.com [::ffff:194.229.47.53]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13Waz6-0008HY-00; Wed, 06 Sep 2000 03:55:08 -0500
Received: (from roland@localhost)
by darkwing.cysonet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id KAA20367
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 10:55:07 +0200
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 10:55:06 +0200
From: Cysonet Roland Kool <roland@darkwing.cysonet.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Update request for documentation
Message-ID: <20000906105506.A19668@darkwing.cysonet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: installation
Version: all
We tried to install the debian SPARC port on a Sun SPARCstation 5 using tftp (the machine only had a CDROM and networkcard to
boot from). We followed the installation instructions on www.debian.org on how to setup tftp bootcapabilities. The
documentation suggested to name the image using the "sun4cdm" as the architecture name. In our case this didn't work and we
figured out that the architecture name was "sun4m". Additional, the documentation states to use a "-" between the
client-ip-in-hex and the architecturename, but in our case this needed to be a "." .
Although this can be due to the age of the SPARC we used (170Mhz), it can't harm to state it in the documentation so other
people can take advantage of this knowledge.
Regards,
Roland Kool
Cyso Network Engineering
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 70991-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2001 03:30:44 +0000
>From adam@onshore-devel.com Wed Oct 17 22:30:44 2001
Return-path: <adam@onshore-devel.com>
Received: from arroz.onshored.com [216.220.101.2] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15u3tL-0006mz-00; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 22:30:44 -0500
Received: from arroz.onshored.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by arroz.onshored.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C91193808
for <70991-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 23:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: adam@arroz.onshored.com
To: 70991-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: b-f bug cleanup
Organization: onShore Development, Inc
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore-devel.com>
Date: 17 Oct 2001 23:31:20 -0400
Message-ID: <oavghd62uv.fsf@arroz.onshored.com>
Lines: 6
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 70991-done@bugs.debian.org
This bug is already fixed in the woody documentation, I just reviewed
it. Thanks for your comments.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
Reply to: