[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: busybox still too bloated

On Tue Sep 25, 2001 at 03:03:48PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:04:28PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Also, what about busybox ash?  Is that mature enough to use instead of
> > the proper ash package?  Or did it have some problems?
> it ignores posix.

posix also requires command line editing.  Are you volunteering
to index all the posix ignoring features?  I'd love to have bug
reports on them all,


Erik B. Andersen   email:  andersee@debian.org, formerly of Lineo
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

Attachment: pgpPcnYlotFxR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: