On Tue Sep 25, 2001 at 03:03:48PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:04:28PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > Also, what about busybox ash? Is that mature enough to use instead of > > the proper ash package? Or did it have some problems? > > it ignores posix. posix also requires command line editing. Are you volunteering to index all the posix ignoring features? I'd love to have bug reports on them all, -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: andersee@debian.org, formerly of Lineo --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
Attachment:
pgpPcnYlotFxR.pgp
Description: PGP signature