ldso shouldn't be in base
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:49:42AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > The perl-base package was not installed. Neither was ldso (which is on the
> > same line in install-debs as base-files and base-passwd). So evidently it is
> > screeching to a halt during libc6 configuration.
> ldso is _still_ in the listing!? That should not be installed on a base
> system. Only libc5 should pull it in.
If no one files a bug, I'll never remember to remove it.
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)