[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debootstrap/b-f interaction -- quieten



Thu, May 24, 2001 at 03:16:36AM -0400 wrote:
> 
> On "install base" (debootstrap) step, I am getting a hang while it
> tells me to acknowledge that it created an empty ld.so.conf and other
> things.  I would prefer if we not make the user have to hit return for
> that...
> 
> -- 

That's by design, but I'm happy to change it.  debootstrap considers these
messages to be warnings, so we were displaying them.  Now those messages will be
displayed just like the informational messages.  I considered making the choice
of behavior conditional on bootargs.quiet.  Another option would be to change
what debootstrap thinks is a warning.  If either of those sound better, speak
up.

David


I just comitted the following:

diff -u -r1.34 extract_base.c
--- extract_base.c      2001/05/15 06:47:13     1.34
+++ extract_base.c      2001/05/24 15:08:26
@@ -128,15 +128,10 @@
        if (ptr[1] == ':')
        {
            switch (ptr[0]){
+               case 'W':
                case 'I':
                    {
                        pleaseWaitBox(ptr+3);
-                       break;
-                   }
-               case 'W':
-                   {
-                       problemBox(ptr+3, _("Warning"));
-                       pleaseWaitBox(_("Continuing"));
                        break;
                    }
                case 'E':



Reply to: