Re: debootstrap/b-f interaction -- quieten
Thu, May 24, 2001 at 03:16:36AM -0400 wrote:
>
> On "install base" (debootstrap) step, I am getting a hang while it
> tells me to acknowledge that it created an empty ld.so.conf and other
> things. I would prefer if we not make the user have to hit return for
> that...
>
> --
That's by design, but I'm happy to change it. debootstrap considers these
messages to be warnings, so we were displaying them. Now those messages will be
displayed just like the informational messages. I considered making the choice
of behavior conditional on bootargs.quiet. Another option would be to change
what debootstrap thinks is a warning. If either of those sound better, speak
up.
David
I just comitted the following:
diff -u -r1.34 extract_base.c
--- extract_base.c 2001/05/15 06:47:13 1.34
+++ extract_base.c 2001/05/24 15:08:26
@@ -128,15 +128,10 @@
if (ptr[1] == ':')
{
switch (ptr[0]){
+ case 'W':
case 'I':
{
pleaseWaitBox(ptr+3);
- break;
- }
- case 'W':
- {
- problemBox(ptr+3, _("Warning"));
- pleaseWaitBox(_("Continuing"));
break;
}
case 'E':
Reply to: