[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#80949: marked as done (Installer /dev/hdaX display/e.g. fdisk mismatch on system with BSD slices)



Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id <oahezs5q5r.fsf@arroz.fake>
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2000 12:21:23 +0000
>From cpaul@augsburg.netsurf.de Sun Dec 31 06:21:23 2000
Return-path: <cpaul@augsburg.netsurf.de>
Received: from ns.dfu.de [195.179.54.2] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14ChUJ-0006rz-00; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 06:21:23 -0600
Received: from augsburg.netsurf.de (core1-4-112.augsburg.netsurf.de [195.179.54.112])
	by ns.dfu.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA02076
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 14:17:38 GMT
Sender: chr@ns.dfu.de
Message-ID: <3A4F16AB.F59CFAE4@augsburg.netsurf.de>
Disposition-Notification-To: "C. Paul" <cpaul@augsburg.netsurf.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:21:15 +0100
From: "C. Paul" <cpaul@augsburg.netsurf.de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Installer /dev/hdaX display/e.g. fdisk mismatch on system with BSD 
 slices
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2

When I try to install (from cd), the installer uses another partitioning
scheme than e.g. fdisk.
It offers to 
- use /dev/hda15 as swap and fails to do so. (because it actually is
hda11)
- offers to format my /dev/hda9, (from 1..15) but mounts my "real" hda9
(from 1..11) on /target.

This is because I have a BSD/386 partition (hda2, as shown below) with
slices 
This is what fdisk sees:
...
/dev/hda2   *       259       775   3908520   a5  BSD/386
/dev/hda3           776       820    340200   83  Linux
/dev/hda4           821      3970  23814000    5  Erweiterte
/dev/hda5           821      1078   1950448+  83  Linux
/dev/hda6   *      1079      1336   1950448+  eb  BeOS-Dateisystem
/dev/hda7          1337      1594   1950448+  83  Linux
/dev/hda8          1595      2111   3908488+  83  Linux
/dev/hda9          2112      3117   7605328+  83  Linux
/dev/hda10         3118      3892   5858968+  83  Linux
/dev/hda11         3893      3970    589648+  82  Linux (Auslagerung)  
...
The Installer recognizes 4 BSD slices. So swap part. a11 is a15, ...
But the system fails to mount /dev/hda15...
And mounts the same hda9 on "/target" as you see above and not a5, as it
should, when calculating this "offset". 

I changed my a2 to something completly different and everything works
like expected.
IMHO this shows that it is dangerous to use different strategies for
display and execution... (sorry, but...)

If I can help or test again feel free to contact me.

--
Chris PAUL
"Live is just a beta test..."
--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 80325-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2001 23:35:28 +0000
>From adam@onshore.com Fri Apr 13 18:35:28 2001
Return-path: <adam@onshore.com>
Received: from arroz.onshored.com [216.220.101.2] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14oD65-0006YA-00; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:35:26 -0500
Received: from arroz.fake (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arroz.onshored.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9D3E993802; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: apharris@burrito.onshore.com
To: 69161-done@bugs.debian.org, 75106-done@bugs.debian.org,
	80325-done@bugs.debian.org, 80949-done@bugs.debian.org,
	56275-done@bugs.debian.org, 62475-done@bugs.debian.org,
	64500-done@bugs.debian.org, 65903-done@bugs.debian.org,
	67510-done@bugs.debian.org, 68497-done@bugs.debian.org,
	69786-done@bugs.debian.org, 70798-done@bugs.debian.org,
	72672-done@bugs.debian.org, 73638-done@bugs.debian.org,
	75018-done@bugs.debian.org, 78328-done@bugs.debian.org,
	78521-done@bugs.debian.org, 78981-done@bugs.debian.org,
	79004-done@bugs.debian.org, 79005-done@bugs.debian.org,
	79459-done@bugs.debian.org, 79734-done@bugs.debian.org,
	79890-done@bugs.debian.org, 82018-done@bugs.debian.org,
	82024-done@bugs.debian.org, 82482-done@bugs.debian.org,
	82912-done@bugs.debian.org, 84989-done@bugs.debian.org,
	84990-done@bugs.debian.org, 85033-done@bugs.debian.org,
	85397-done@bugs.debian.org, 88226-done@bugs.debian.org,
	90967-done@bugs.debian.org, 93054-done@bugs.debian.org,
	93069-done@bugs.debian.org, 93421-done@bugs.debian.org,
	83131-done@bugs.debian.org, 92907-done@bugs.debian.org,
	64565-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
Message-ID: <oahezs5q5r.fsf@arroz.fake>
Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 80325-done@bugs.debian.org


Thank you very much for your bug report.  We believe the issue you
reported is solved as of boot-floppies 2.3.1.  That is the woody
version of boot-floppies, which is available in the archive, or, some
SPARC and i386, at
<URL:http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/woody/main/>.

If you feel your bug is still outstanding, please let us know or
reopen your bug -- see <http://www.debian.org/Bugs/> for instructions
how to do that.

We are not longer working on Potato boot-floppies, except for critical
issues.  If you feel that your bug hasn't been fixed as of
boot-floppies 2.2.22 (the latest Potato version), then you we need to
reopen your bug and put the 'potato' tag on it.  Please be sparing --
the more we are distracted with Potato issues, the less effort we are
able to put into Woody boot-floppies.

Again, thanks for your report.  Bug reports are a significant
contribution to Debian. We apologize that it probably took so long to
fix the issue you reported.

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onshore.com.....<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>



Reply to: