Re: cvs commit to boot-floppies/utilities/busybox by aph
Sorry I didn't reply earlier.
Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org> writes:
> I thought you had removed busybox and were using the .deb now...
> I guess that is just the woody version?
Yes, just woody.
> Regardless, if you are
> going to be doing some backporting, would you mind if I modernize
> a few other selected things? For starters, I think we would be
> wise to backport a few other fixes.
I don't mind if you wanna back port some busybox fixes into the
ancient version in Potato. Try to keep it to a minimum if possible,
just fixing crippling stuff.
> Initially, I would like to backport init.c so we get 2.4 kernel
> support. (which will silence a lot of bug reports before they
> happen). Is this agreeable?
I don't think this is necessary for the potato version because we
absolutely don't support 2.4 in Potato.
As for the woody version, we're using busybox.deb.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onshore.com.....<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
Reply to: