> GTK is nice, but it's not going on a floppy. This will. OK, so what about being the "deluxe" installation UI on CD/broadband installs as Randolph has suggested? The question here is whether there is a significant benefit from using the frame buffer as opposed to using X. I think there is. > I admit I'd rather have a less hokey widget set, but the other > advantage of BOGL is a compact utf8 and i18n library; does GTK have > something similar? This is what pango does for a living, a requirement for gtk-fb (and maybe gtk-x11 as well?) Since gtk-fb requires pango, thats just something else that would have to be included in the installation udeb. -- Chris Ruffin <c.ruffin@ieee.org>
Attachment:
pgpM51CWhqUPA.pgp
Description: PGP signature