Re: Replacing ae
Erik Andersen wrote:
> Having carefully looked over nano-tiny ('apt-get install nano-tiny' for the
> curious) I propose we immediately throw ae out of the boot-floppies and use
> nano-tiny instead. It is already linked vs slang so there are no library
> problems. It _is slightly_ bigger. On x86 it adds 16k. That is a price I
> would be glad to pay.
nano is better than ae. it'd be a good decision.
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara