[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: disposition of boot-floppies in woody



On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 01:48:00PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Anthony Towns claimed on debian-devel that it would take us "a few
> months" to prepare boot-floppies for woody.  I think it can be done by
> Feb. 

Well, I have no complaints if you get things done earlier, of course :)

> I don't think there many major issues.  Here's the one's I know
> of:
>   - use busybox.deb from woody rather than the local CVS copy
>   - dealing with new kernel (what is the proposed kernel for woody,
>     anyhow?)

I'd presume we'd ship with 2.2.x on the boot floppies and as our
standard kernel, with 2.4.x kernel images readily available for those
that want them (and supported).

> I was told by Joey Hess that we still will be needing boot-floppies
> for woody.  Can that please get confirmed?

We either need boot-floppies or debian-installer for woody; and if Joey
says debian-installer won't be ready, I can only see one conclusion. So,
yes, we're going with b-f's for woody. Is that the confirmation you want?

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

     ``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
                       -- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001

Attachment: pgpXzMqTcYYuF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: