Re: regarding potato images
Jim Westveer <email@example.com> writes:
> On 01-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Um, I thought it went like this for i386:
> > CD#1: vanilla kernel
> > CD#2: compact
> > CD#3: idepci
> #1 & #2 correct, for potato, i386, CD#3 has no boot blocks.
> It (CD#3) probably should be modified to have a boot image.
> I'll take a look at it. Just the boot blocks do not take
> much space. If it will fit, we probably should put idepci
> on CD#3. Thoughts ???
Yes, I agree.
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>