Bug#53565: marked as done (Install documentation)
Your message dated 18 Nov 2000 15:06:35 -0500
with message-id <email@example.com>
and subject line Bug#53565: Install documentation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 1999 23:12:14 +0000
Received: (qmail 8560 invoked from network); 27 Dec 1999 23:12:14 -0000
Received: from smtp7.atl.mindspring.net (126.96.36.199)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 Dec 1999 23:12:14 -0000
Received: from wheat (user-33qth3f.dialup.mindspring.com [188.8.131.52])
by smtp7.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA20860
for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 18:12:07 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 15:11:02 -0800
From: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org>
Subject: Install documentation
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
version: 12/20/99 unstable; 2.2.1 of "Installing Debian for Intel"
Chapter 5, p 22 says "The different choices are described in .. on this page"
They are not described on that page. It would be good to have a page and
section reference in addition to the title of the section where they are
p 23 , section 5.1.1 last sentence reads
This method is described in 'Installing from a Hard Disk' on the page before.
The page before has no such heading, and provides no such description.
Although p. 22 says that the first boot is described in its own section
[which is actually a chapter], there is no discussion of the install from
hard disk there.
More generally, I think the separation of the two chapters (5 + 6) and the
sequencing of material between them is unfortunate. Why should the first
step be to skip ahead to chapter 6, only to later return to chapter 5?
Just put things in the order that someone doing an install would have to
make decisions and carry out actions.
The instructions are obviously out of date with respect to the evolving
structure of boot floppies and files; for example, they refer to a single
I also vote with others who say the material on adding boot-time parameters
needs to clarify that you must say "default" (or linux or ...) before, for
example, hd=cyl/head/sector. This point tripped me up in the past.
A note on how much to worry about drive geometry would be good; my disk has
been "too large" and needed that assist with previous versions, and I don't
know if that continues to be the case.
Received: (at 53565-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2000 20:06:22 +0000
>From email@example.com Sat Nov 18 14:06:22 2000
Received: from (burrito.onshore.com) [184.108.40.206] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13xEFi-0001xx-00; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 14:06:22 -0600
Received: from arroz.fake (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by burrito.onshore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D354693802
for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 15:06:35 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Bug#53565: Install documentation
From: Adam Di Carlo <email@example.com>
Date: 18 Nov 2000 15:06:35 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I believe the issues raised in this bug report are all fixed. I am
closing this report.
Ross, if you still are finding problems, you can either fix them
directly in CVS or else file new reports. I'm flushing out old and
over-generalized bug reports.
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>