[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: busybox in woody (was Re: first weekly debian-installer status report)

	I'm not sure whether this would fit, but wouldn't it be a lot
easier to put /usr/lib/busybox/* as the first directory in the PATH

Matt Rose        mattrose@folkwolf.net          http://www.folkwolf.net
"I've seen scarier secret police agencies than his completely destroyed 
by a Czech hippie playwright with a manual typewriter"  Bruce Sterling

On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Erik Andersen wrote:

> On Sun Nov 12, 2000 at 03:11:53PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > > 
> > > Once Erik uploads busybox udebs, he will also be uploading the source,
> > > and I think a regular .deb with busybox packaged for a regular system.
> > > So the boot-floppies can use either of those.
> > 
> > Ok, so in woody we'll be using the busybox*.deb file to build the root
> > filesystem, pretty much using the same mechanisms already defined in
> > scripts/rootdisk, correct?
> > 
> > Will means be provided to create the requisite symlinks in /usr/bin ?
> <sorry for being slaw to get back to this -- just when I thought I was
> going to get this last weekend to work on this they send me to Europe
> on business.  I just got back last night>
> I am open to suggestions on exactly what you want things to like like for
> woody.  With the latest busybox, all symlinks are relative one.  Therefore, I
> was thinking I would just create the normal hierarchy, but instead of under /
> put everything under /usr/lib/busybox.  Sound agreeable?  So you could simply
> extract /usr/lib/busybox from busybox.#.deb and mv /usr/lib/busybox/* to the
> target.  All the other junk (docs, manpages, etc) would be ignored.  Does this
> sound agreeable? 
>  -Erik
> --
> Erik B. Andersen   email:  andersee@debian.org
> --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: