[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#64182: marked as done (New installs should always use devpts by default)



Your message dated 16 May 2000 03:15:08 -0400
with message-id <oazoprufsz.fsf@arroz.fake>
and subject line Bug#64182: New installs should always use devpts by default
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2000 00:34:56 +0000
>From cesarb@nitnet.com.br Mon May 15 19:34:56 2000
Received: from itaipu.nitnet.com.br [200.255.111.241] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 #2 (Debian))
	id 12rVK3-000180-00; Mon, 15 May 2000 19:34:56 -0500
Received: (qmail 19710 invoked from network); 16 May 2000 00:41:50 -0000
Received: from salzburg.nitnet.com.br (HELO cesarb2.cesarb.personal) (200.255.111.229)
  by itaipu.nitnet.com.br with SMTP; 16 May 2000 00:41:50 -0000
Received: from cesarb by cesarb2.cesarb.personal with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 12rVJx-0000WK-00; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:34:49 -0300
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@nitnet.com.br>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: New installs should always use devpts by default
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 21:34:49 -0300
Message-Id: <[🔎] E12rVJx-0000WK-00@cesarb2.cesarb.personal>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: boot-floppies
Version: N/A; reported 2000-05-15
Severity: normal

Even with new installs using a 2.2.x kernel by default, why is the devpts entry
in /etc/fstab commented out?

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cesarb2 2.2.14 #1 Wed May 10 17:20:51 BRT 2000 i586


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 64182-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2000 07:16:22 +0000
>From adam@onshore.com Tue May 16 02:16:22 2000
Received: from amsterdam.interport.net [199.184.165.19] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2 (Debian))
	id 12rbaY-0004V3-00; Tue, 16 May 2000 02:16:22 -0500
Received: from arroz.fake (postfix@209-122-237-227.s608.tnt2.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com [209.122.237.227])
	by amsterdam.interport.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA24286;
	Tue, 16 May 2000 03:15:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
	id EB3D093802; Tue, 16 May 2000 03:15:08 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: apharris@arroz.fake
To: Petr Cech <cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: 64182-done@bugs.debian.org, Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@nitnet.com.br>
Subject: Re: Bug#64182: New installs should always use devpts by default
References: <[🔎] E12rVJx-0000WK-00@cesarb2.cesarb.personal> <[🔎] 20000515222901.I17464@tausq.org> <[🔎] 20000516083534.A10739@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 16 May 2000 03:15:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: Petr Cech's message of "Tue, 16 May 2000 08:35:35 +0200"
Message-ID: <oazoprufsz.fsf@arroz.fake>
Lines: 18
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 64182-done@bugs.debian.org

Petr Cech <cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> writes:

> On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 10:29:01PM -0700 , Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > Even with new installs using a 2.2.x kernel by default, why is the devpts entry
> > > in /etc/fstab commented out?
> 
> because there is another way
> 
> > hrm. what version of boot-floppies were you using? in the few tests i've
> > done devpts is always enabled.
> 
> Yes. /etc/init.d/devpts.sh in libc6 enables it, if it's supported by the
> kernel.

Right you are.  Closing bug.

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>



Reply to: