Re: [Woody - dbootstrap] RFC: Better state machine for main_menu()?

To: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Cc: Debian Boot <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [Woody - dbootstrap] RFC: Better state machine for main_menu()?
From: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)
Date: 12 May 2000 22:51:32 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87vh0j6lqz.fsf@bittersweet.intra>
In-reply-to: Adam Di Carlo's message of "12 May 2000 11:23:10 -0400"
References: <[🔎] 87zopwb52r.fsf@bittersweet.intra> <[🔎] oak8gzlrmp.fsf@arroz.fake>

>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> writes:

    Adam> karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
    >> Maybe `main_menu()' can be redone somehow - make the state machine a
    >> little nicer - use a state table for deciding what is next and what
    >> to offer, etc.  A checklist might be useful...

    Adam> I believe in woody dbootstrap is eliminated complete in favor of a
    Adam> little debconf-based media selected and bootstrapper.

 Hmmm...  Perl won't fit on the root.bin though...

 I wonder if anyone (Joey?) has started a planning / specification
 document yet?

Reply to:

References:
- [Woody - dbootstrap] RFC: Better state machine for main_menu()?
  - From: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)
- Re: [Woody - dbootstrap] RFC: Better state machine for main_menu()?
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Woody - dbootstrap] RFC: Better state machine for main_menu()?
Next by Date: FWD: Re: kernel 2.2.15, aic7xxx driver 5.1.29
Previous by thread: Re: [Woody - dbootstrap] RFC: Better state machine for main_menu()?
Next by thread: Re: [Woody - dbootstrap] RFC: Better state machine for main_menu()?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread