Bug#62234: marked as done ([slink] Kernel Detects Harddrive Size incorrectly)
Your message dated 03 May 2000 13:21:19 -0400
with message-id <oaln1ra6sw.fsf@arroz.fake>
and subject line bugs closed in potato boot-floppies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2000 10:07:43 +0000
Received: (qmail 32232 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2000 10:07:42 -0000
Received: from sr14.nsw-remote.bigpond.net.au (24.192.3.29)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2000 10:07:42 -0000
Received: from dad (CPE-144-132-191-190.nsw.bigpond.net.au [144.132.191.190])
by sr14.nsw-remote.bigpond.net.au (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA16303
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:07:11 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <000a01bfa465$aa5df640$a25ffea9@nsw.bigpond.net.au>
From: "Gary Cordes" <gcordes@bigpond.net.au>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Boot-floppies: Kernel Detects Harddrive Size incorrectly.
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:58:31 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Package: Boot-floppies
version: Slink
architecture: i386
model: Dual Celeron 400,
memory: 128mb
scsi: None
cd-rom: Diamond Data 40x, ATAPI
network card: Generic, Realtek Chipset, Ne2000 compatable.
pcmcia: None
Harddrive: IDE, Maxtor, 91360D6, 13500MB, 7200rpm
When booting from the CD, The kernel detects the harddrive as the correct
model #, but with an Incorrect capacity. (causing problems partitioning).
The Bios and dos FDISK get disk size correctly.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 62234-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2000 17:21:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 11188 invoked from network); 3 May 2000 17:21:30 -0000
Received: from amsterdam.interport.net (199.184.165.19)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 3 May 2000 17:21:30 -0000
Received: from arroz.fake (postfix@216-164-222-228.s482.tnt4.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com [216.164.222.228])
by amsterdam.interport.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA19326;
Wed, 3 May 2000 13:21:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 89B6693802; Wed, 3 May 2000 13:21:19 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: apharris@arroz.fake
To: 62623-done@bugs.debian.org, 62234-done@bugs.debian.org,
61279-done@bugs.debian.org, 60947-done@bugs.debian.org,
60574-done@bugs.debian.org, 57846-done@bugs.debian.org,
57770-done@bugs.debian.org, 57243-done@bugs.debian.org,
49605-done@bugs.debian.org, 42019-done@bugs.debian.org,
41919-done@bugs.debian.org, 41558-done@bugs.debian.org,
41033-done@bugs.debian.org, 38090-done@bugs.debian.org,
38089-done@bugs.debian.org, 36313-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bugs closed in potato boot-floppies
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 03 May 2000 13:21:19 -0400
Message-ID: <oaln1ra6sw.fsf@arroz.fake>
Lines: 16
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
We believe that the bug you reported has been closed in the Potato
version of the boot-floppies. We may not have received a response
from you so we are closing this bug.
Please let us know if you find that the bug still exists in the potato
version of the boot-floppies, and we can re-open your bug.
Note that there are some temporary but serious problems with those
floppies you should know about on i386:
- installation of base from floppy probably not working
- the compact flavor may not work
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: