Re: Czech documentation troubles (was help needed on wierd install manual build problems)
On Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 12:41:22PM -0400 , Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Petr Cech <cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> writes:
>
> > I may not be the best person to comment on this, but I think it has something
> > to do with Czech beeing unsupported by plain tetex-* packages in Debian.
> > There are four packages which add Czech support to TeX - csplain, cslatex and
> > cstexfonts and cspsfonts.
>
> > There should be one more package cspdftex. I didn't want to upload this
> > package as it edit pdftex config file and I didn't have time to investigate it
> > more.
>
> ARGH. Could you give me the package at least so I can build
> documentation for www.debian.org properly?
It builds correctly, but the PDF looks ugly. Strange is, it I comment out
\usepackage{t1enc}
then is uses the correct font and looks aproximatly correct.
> This state of affairs is totally unacceptable. You are saying Czech
> documentation won't build properly unless you have non-Debian software
> installed.
no. it builds, but only uses IMHO rastered fonts and not pdf fonts
> I think we need to disable Czech documentation, then. I'd rather
> disable it than have faulty documentation all over the place. Do you
> have comments?
No, it builds just fine - same problems have hr and I think other latin2
languages. And it only effects the .pdf file generation.
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
<sgore> We Are Debian. You Will Be Packaged. Media Opinion Is Irrelevant.
Reply to: