Bug#60956: ARM is not supported (patch included)

To: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Cc: 60956@bugs.debian.org, Jim Studt <jim@federated.com>
Subject: Bug#60956: ARM is not supported (patch included)
From: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)
Date: 23 Mar 2000 18:47:02 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 874s9xqe3d.fsf@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
Reply-to: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom), 60956@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: Adam Di Carlo's message of "23 Mar 2000 01:04:15 -0500"
References: <[🔎] 200003222347.RAA18715@core.federated.com> <[🔎] oa66ue1au8.fsf@arroz.fake>

>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> writes:

    Adam> I glanced at this patch and it looks pretty safe.  I think we'll apply
    Adam> it after the 2.2.9 release hopefully later this week.

 Why not just toss it in now, Adam?  There will likely be
 errors... but what the hell?  Let's get it out there and let folks
 find them.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#60956: ARM is not supported (patch included)
  - From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
- Bug#60956: ARM is not supported (patch included)
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>

References:
- Bug#60956: ARM is not supported (patch included)
  - From: Jim Studt <jim@federated.com>
- Bug#60956: ARM is not supported (patch included)
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#60924: HTTP file retreival does not work.
Next by Date: Re: [woody-discussion] monte + detect
Previous by thread: Bug#60956: ARM is not supported (patch included)
Next by thread: Bug#60956: ARM is not supported (patch included)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread