[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [vague discussion] woody boot-floppies plans

On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 02:34:14PM -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
> Just translating the whiptail dialogs into GUI dialogs and adding
> backdrops would look nice, but it would really just be adding complexity
> to the existing installation system (or, preferably, the system outlined
> by Joey H. (message ID:  [🔎] 20000207174538.E25437@kitenet.net)) without
> gaining much.  I guess that's what you are getting at, eh. 

Wasn't there a proposal of making the woody BF entirely on
debconf? This would give us instant UI-independence, web-based
installation control (duh, how? shipping a minimal server in a
custom disk image?), and other stuff.

(Then, as was said, it's a matter of having a good NanoX-based
debconf front-end)

      I am Lalo of deB-org. You will be freed.
                 Resistance is futile.

http://www.webcom.com/lalo      mailto:lalo@webcom.com
                 pgp key in the web page

Debian GNU/Linux       ---       http://www.debian.org
Brazil of Darkness   --   http://zope.gf.com.br/BroDar

Reply to: