Bug#56821: [POSSIBLE GRAVE SECURITY HOLD]
- To: quinot@inf.enst.fr
- Cc: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>, Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr>, Samuel Tardieu <sam@debian.org>, Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>, "Huneycutt, Doug" <doug.huneycutt@lmco.com>, 56821@bugs.debian.org, pb@enst.fr, quinot@enst.fr, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#56821: [POSSIBLE GRAVE SECURITY HOLD]
- From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Date: 05 Feb 2000 22:57:31 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87ya8z53no.fsf@erwin.complete.org>
- Reply-to: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>, 56821@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: Thomas Quinot's message of "Thu, 3 Feb 2000 00:36:24 +0100"
- References: <[🔎] 2000-02-02-11-38-12+trackit+sam@debian.org> <[🔎] 87vh47k3v1.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <[🔎] 20000202175255.E50448@enst.fr> <[🔎] 873drby1na.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <[🔎] 20000202181855.H50448@enst.fr> <[🔎] 87n1pjy0qs.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <[🔎] 20000202184944.K50448@enst.fr> <[🔎] 20000202151522.J7238@visi.net> <[🔎] 20000203003624.A2812@lantier.enst.fr>
What's your point in insisting that it isn't when it clearly is?
Thomas Quinot <quinot@email.enst.fr> writes:
> Le 2000-02-02, Ben Collins écrivait :
>
> > Quite simply, there is no such thing as a default security for physical
> > access. You said yourself that you have to change LILO in order to achieve
> > this anyway, why didn't you just edit lilo to install on the MBR?
> >
> > boot=/dev/hda
> > root=/dev/hda1
> >
> > It's quite simple.
>
> Granted, this is simple. What is your point in insisting that this should
> not be documented?
>
> --
> Thomas Quinot ** Département Informatique & Réseaux ** quinot@inf.enst.fr
> ENST // 46 rue Barrault // 75634 PARIS CEDEX 13
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting & programming jgoerzen@complete.org |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade) www.debian.org |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The 1,183,058th digit of pi is 7.
Reply to: