Re: RFC: moving busybox into its own .deb
On Mon Jan 17, 2000 at 11:02:00PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote:
>
> On old low memory systems like 386 and 486, ash could be an alternative to
> bash, I guess. In this point of view, it should be as small as possible (think
> about /bin/sh from Solaris, it does not support line editing either ;)).
>
The patch I provided adds less than 1k to ash, and requires no additional
libraries to be linked (just libc.so.6 and ld-linux.so.2). I'm putting
together a .deb with it applied so folks can try it out and see what they think
(I'll post a link to it when I finish). It really is much nicer IMHO. And it
makes ash comply with debian keyboard policy,
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen Web: http://www.xmission.com/~andersen/
email: andersee@debian.org
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
Reply to: