[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#54580: marked as done (base-config: rm'd all packages files???)



Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2000 13:44:22 -0800
with message-id <20000111134422.H30381@kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#54648: base-config: breaks syslogging?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2000 23:42:45 +0000
Received: (qmail 24724 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2000 23:42:44 -0000
Received: from 209-130-218-187.nas1.roc.gblx.net (HELO phoenix.overdue.net) (@209.130.218.187)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2000 23:42:44 -0000
Received: by phoenix.overdue.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 69BC43085A; Sun,  9 Jan 2000 23:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: Lazarus Long <lazarus@overdue.dhis.net>
Subject: base-config: rm'd all packages files???
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.7
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20000109234232.69BC43085A@phoenix.overdue.net>
Date: Sun,  9 Jan 2000 23:42:32 +0000 (UTC)

Package: base-config
Version: 0.01
Severity: normal

Get:60 http://http.us.debian.org potato/non-free Sources [31.6kB]

This after an apt-get update, once apt-get upgrade told me each of the
packages files it tried to stat weren't there.  And base-config had been
the only thing installed after the last apt run, hence it must be the culprit.

Screenfuls of "unable to stat foo" were more appropriate to paste here,
but alas, I didnt think to capture it all.  Regetting 60 pacakges files
seems wasteful.

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux phoenix 2.2.14 #1 Thu Jan 6 01:44:28 UTC 2000 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages base-config depends on:
ii  apt                         0.3.15                      Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  debconf                     0.2.67                      Debian configuration management system
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 54580-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2000 21:44:32 +0000
Received: (qmail 22951 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2000 21:44:28 -0000
Received: from adsl-63-193-116-241.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO kitenet.net) (qmailr@63.193.116.241)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2000 21:44:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 1694 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2000 21:44:22 -0000
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 13:44:22 -0800
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 54648-done@bugs.debian.org, 54675-done@bugs.debian.org,
  54635-done@bugs.debian.org, 54648-done@bugs.debian.org,
  54652-done@bugs.debian.org, 54708-done@bugs.debian.org,
  54578-done@bugs.debian.org, 54580-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#54648: base-config: breaks syslogging?
Message-ID: <20000111134422.H30381@kitenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 20000110172332.AE2AF3085E@phoenix.overdue.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20000110172332.AE2AF3085E@phoenix.overdue.net>; from lazarus@overdue.dhis.net on Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 05:23:32PM +0000

Fixed in 0.04.

Many of these bugs were duplicates filed by the same person. "Lazarus",
don't do that. It's bloody annoying and a waste of my time.

-- 
see shy jo


Reply to: