boot-floppies_2.2.1: base not made with dpkg.
Hello,
it looks like dpkg is not letting base_passwd_2.1.2.deb to be fully
installed.
The trace says on my setting that I need to use dpkg --configure dpkg
in order to
be working with epoch. But dpkg needs base_passwd...!
some traces:
+++last_by_version
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb
+++local
a=/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb
+++local b=
+++'[' -z '' ']'
+++echo
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb
+++exit 0
++p=/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb
++'[' '!' -f
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb
']'
++PATHS=
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/base-files_2.1.10.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/mawk_1.3.3-3.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/base-passwd_2.1.2.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb
++false
++echo
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/base-files_2.1.10.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/mawk_1.3.3-3.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/base-passwd_2.1.2.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb
+corepkgs=/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/base-files_2.1.10.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/mawk_1.3.3-3.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/base-passwd_2.1.2.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb
# @@ Marcel NOTE: new bash creates $B/bin/sh in postinst script, so we
have to
# make a link ourselves so that package scripts can execute.
(cd $B;if [ ! -e bin/sh ]; then ln -s bash bin/sh; fi)
+cd /var/tmp/boot-floppies/base-tmp-26506
+'[' '!' -e bin/sh ']'
+ln -s bash bin/sh
# @@ Marcel NOTE: make a temporary $B/usr/bin/perl link, needed for
package
# installation scripts.
(cd $B;if [ ! -e usr/bin/perl ]; then ln -s perl-5.005 usr/bin/perl; fi)
+cd /var/tmp/boot-floppies/base-tmp-26506
+'[' '!' -e usr/bin/perl ']'
+ln -s perl-5.005 usr/bin/perl
(cd $B;dpkg --root=. --install --debug=1 --force-depends
--force-auto-select $corepkgs)
+cd /var/tmp/boot-floppies/base-tmp-26506
+dpkg --root=. --install --debug=1 --force-depends --force-auto-select
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/base-files_2.1.10.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/mawk_1.3.3-3.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/base-passwd_2.1.2.deb
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb
Selecting previously deselected package base-files.
(Reading database ... 0 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking base-files (from .../base/base-files_2.1.10.deb) ...
D000001: process_archive oldversionstatus=not installed
conflictor=<none>
D000001: process_archive updating info directory
Selecting previously deselected package mawk.
dpkg: regarding .../base/mawk_1.3.3-3.deb containing mawk,
pre-dependency problem:
mawk pre-depends on libc6
libc6 is not installed.
dpkg: warning - ignoring pre-dependency problem !
Unpacking mawk (from .../base/mawk_1.3.3-3.deb) ...
D000001: process_archive oldversionstatus=not installed
conflictor=<none>
D000001: process_archive updating info directory
Selecting previously deselected package base-passwd.
Unpacking base-passwd (from .../base/base-passwd_2.1.2.deb) ...
D000001: process_archive oldversionstatus=not installed
conflictor=<none>
dpkg not recorded as installed, cannot check for epoch support !
dpkg: error processing
/var/arch/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/base-passwd_2.1.2.deb
(--install):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Selecting previously deselected package ldso.
Unpacking ldso (from .../base/ldso_1.9.11-5.deb) ...
D000001: process_archive oldversionstatus=not installed
conflictor=<none>
...
Here base_passwd has failed installation, and later down the line llibc6
also...
Can something be done to remaidythis ?
Thanks.
Christian.
Reply to: