Bug#19773: marked as done (debian 2.0 install from 1.2 floppy set / monochrome monitor)
Your message dated 22 Mar 1999 23:32:40 -0500
with message-id <oavhfs6d1z.fsf@burrito.fake>
and subject line #19773 -- debian 2.0 install from 1.2 floppy set / monochrome monitor
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 1998 17:24:30 +0000
Received: (qmail 15745 invoked from network); 16 Mar 1998 17:24:21 -0000
Received: from cabtep2.cnea.edu.ar (168.96.74.242)
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 16 Mar 1998 17:24:21 -0000
Received: from localhost by cabtep2.cnea.edu.ar
with smtp id m0yEdF4-002da7C
(Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Mon, 16 Mar 1998 14:00:02 -0300 (ART)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 14:00:02 -0300 (ART)
From: System <sysadm@cabtep2.cnea.edu.ar>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: debian 2.0 install from 1.2 floppy set / monochrome monitor
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980316135430.288A-100000@cabtep2.cnea.edu.ar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: disks-i386
Version: 1998-02-20
when installing debian 2.0 from the 1.2Mby floppy set
(resc1200.bin/root.bin):
--------------
with the monochrome mode: (i haven't checked with a color monitor)
the blinking underscore cursor on the left side of the guided installation
list is normally on a different line that the hash # sign on the right
hand side of the list (sometimes one or two lines below, sometimes above)
with the monochormoe mode it is not possible to know the selection one has
made in the first step (selecting mono/color), the # and the _ are always
on the same line.
-----------------------
Reply to: