Re: version 2.1.8 committed, tagged and uploaded
Adam Di Carlo writes:
>
>Well, we will definately need a 2.1.9, if only for documentation
>updates. This is probably a bit less critical, however, since,
>alternatively, we can say "go to www.debian.org" for newest docs, for
>instance.
>
>i386 docs are pretty good shape but I'm not happy about the LILO
>instructions. In the last 25% of the document there probably are a
>few problems I didn't catch.
>
>M68k just had a major patch from Michael (post 2.1.8) -- they are
>definately in the best shape of the different platforms. Post
>installation booting and other stuff from chapter 6 on needs work, I
>imagine.
>
>I just got a big comment from Eric on the Sparc stuff; that still has
>a *long* way to go. Need to document SILO, and a lot of the basics
>for sparc.
>
>Winning the record for farthest from done is the Alpha version, where
>we have to document SRM, MILO, etc etc etc etc!!
Eeek! If it comes to the crunch, any extra docs updates could go into
slink_cd if it makes life easier; we can patch the install docs quite
easily...
Or if we do a 2.1.9, the last-disc-first multicd thing would be lovely...
--
Steve McIntyre, CURS CCE, Cambridge, UK. stevem@chiark.greenend.org.uk
<a href=http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~stevem/comp/>My PC page</a>
"Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, +------------------
"Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I..." |Finger for PGP key
Reply to: