Re: Bug#32595: remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- To: Martin Mitchell <martin@debian.org>
- Cc: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>, 32595@bugs.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-testing@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#32595: remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- From: Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@ull.es>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 15:36:35 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19990130153635.B9214@molec3.dfis.ull.es>
- Mail-followup-to: Martin Mitchell <martin@debian.org>, Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>, 32595@bugs.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-testing@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 871zkciy65.fsf@mail.usyd.edu.au>; from Martin Mitchell on Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:21:38AM +1100
- References: <[🔎] oahfta54tl.fsf@burrito.fake> <[🔎] 87g18slww3.fsf@mail.usyd.edu.au> <[🔎] 19990130141742.A8977@molec3.dfis.ull.es> <[🔎] 871zkciy65.fsf@mail.usyd.edu.au>
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:21:38AM +1100, Martin Mitchell wrote:
> Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@ull.es> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 12:21:00AM +1100, Martin Mitchell wrote:
> > > I strongly object to removing all of those except cdrom. I don't find apt
> > > adequate for my needs at this stage.
> >
> > What about dpkg-multicd?
>
> I have no objection to cdrom being replaced with dpkg-multicd.
But dpkg-multicd is more than multiple-cds. There's multi-nfs,
multi-mount, ... that replace nfs, mounted, ...
That's why we think dpkg default methods can be removed/extracted to a
different package.
> > I don't see anything "essential" in them. There are a lot of methods
> > available on slink (and slink's base system) that work as well than dpkg
> > default methods.
>
> Remember that dselect isn't just used to install the system, you also
> need to maintain it. I don't find the apt method an appropriate tool at
> this stage for maintenance. Where it excels at present is in the initial
> installation.
Why do you think it's not suited for maintenance? I've been using it on
a lot of machines here for ~6 months (with a local mirror, ftp access or
http access) and it works a lot better than the other methods.
Using autofs it even works with an NFS mounted mirror.
> > If you still need dpkg default methods, a proper solution would be to
> > extract them to a different package (say, dpkg-defaults), make dpkt-ftp,
> > dpkg-mountable, dpkg-multicd, dpkg-defaults, apt ... provide a virtual
> > package "dpkg-method" and make dpkg depend on dpkg-method.
>
> This should be done in the future, but not at the moment, certainly not
> just before slink's release.
Sounds reasonable. But it should be done for potato.
> I don't call the 6 options currently in my dselect's access menu crowded,
> I'd say it was flexible.
If some of those options don't work, some are duplicated, and there's no
way to get rid of them, that's crowded.
--
Enrique Zanardi ezanardi@ull.es
Reply to:
- References:
- remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Re: Bug#32595: remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- From: Martin Mitchell <martin@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#32595: remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- From: Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@ull.es>
- Re: Bug#32595: remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- From: Martin Mitchell <martin@debian.org>
- Prev by Date:
Re: Bug#32595: remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- Next by Date:
Re: Bug#32595: remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- Previous by thread:
Re: Bug#32595: remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- Next by thread:
Re: Bug#32595: remove obsolete and confusing acquisition methods: harddisk, mounted, cdrom, nfs
- Index(es):