[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 2 versions of release notes



In message <oa4rm8y5lg.fsf@arroz.onshored.com>, Adam Di Carlo writes:
>Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org> writes:
>> In message <20011228043508.GB218@Obsession>, Chris Tillman writes:
>> >robster, who volunteered for the project, is committing changes in one
>> >branch at version 1.61.2.4, while others are working in the trunk at
>> >version 1.72. I suspect the differences are slight, but they should be
>> >merged?
>> 
>> Right, yeah.  Presumably this branch is the old "woody" one, and robster is
>> working on it by mistake?
>
>Yes, Josip Rodin builds the documentation which is used for
>www.d.o/dists/woody, and I can assure you he's not using the branch!
>So Robster better get his act together.

Has this been sorted out yet?  From a quick look at the CVS logs it doesn't 
appear so.  The longer the branch stays forked the more of a mess it will be
when it's finally merged back.

p.



Reply to: